In the ongoing Senzo Meyiwa murder trial, the defense vigorously challenges the prosecution’s case, asserting that someone surreptitiously planted the bullet projectile discovered in the kitchen to replace the original piece. This contentious revelation emerged as Lieutenant Colonel Thobeka Mhlahlo faced rigorous cross-examination in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on August 22nd.
Lieutenant Colonel Mhlahlo, responsible for documenting photographic evidence at the crime scene where the former Bafana Bafana captain tragically lost his life on October 26th, 2014, provided a gripping account of her discovery. She recalled finding the bullet projectile conspicuously positioned on the kitchen counter, concealed behind a cluster of glass jars.
Advocate Charles Mnisi, representing accused number three, Mthobisi Mncube, seized the opportunity during cross-examination to assert that someone had indeed planted the bullet. An intense exchange ensued as Mnisi pressed Mhlahlo on the matter, and she responded by claiming no knowledge of tampering during her presence at the scene.
The intrigue deepened as Mnisi also raised questions about the small wooden fragments adjacent to the bullet. He suggested that these fragments might have been planted as well. Mhlahlo’s response was cryptic, casting doubt on the origin of these fragments but indicating they were found during her initial examination of the crime scene alongside Mosia and Zwane.
However, advocate Zithulele Nxumalo, who represents accused number four, Mthokoziseni Ziphozonke Maphisa, articulated the defense’s argument, focusing on the selective handling of evidence.
Nxumalo further revisited the testimony of Warrant Officer Thabo Mosia, a pivotal figure in the investigation. Mosia’s account echoed the testimonies of two police sergeants. Patrick Mthethwa and Timothy Mathebula, who also attested to the absence of the bullet projectile in the kitchen. On the day of Meyiwa’s murder. These consistent testimonies fueled suspicion that someone discreetly replaced the bullet projectile.
In a dramatic turn of events, Nxumalo boldly asserted. “Someone removed a bullet projectile fired from a revolver. That didn’t eject a cartridge from the scene and replaced it with a different one. It was planted.” The accusation hung heavily in the courtroom as Nxumalo challenged the integrity of the investigation.
The defense lawyer then questioned Mhlahlo about her photographic documentation of cartridges or projectiles as exhibits. Mhlahlo’s response was a categorical “no.”
Moreover, this contentious courtroom exchange marks a pivotal moment in the trial. Shedding light on allegations of evidence tampering and raising questions about the reliability of key forensic evidence. As the trial unfolds, the defense’s claims of a planted bullet projectile promise. To add layers of complexity to an already perplexing case.
In addition, Accused 1, Muzikawukhulelwa Sibiya, and Accused 2, Bongani Sandiso Ntanzi. Along with the other accused, stand united in the face of charges including: premeditated murder. Attempted murder, robbery with aggravating circumstances, possession of firearms without a license, and possession of ammunition. The courtroom remains a stage of intense scrutiny and anticipation as the trial progresses.
